Recent years have seen a steady rise in the frequency and amounts awarded in so-called “nuclear verdicts.” At the same time, the jury pool itself is evolving, forcing defense attorneys to reassess what types of jurors might favor their clients’ interests. Two major shifts we have seen include the rise of safetyism and spread of beliefs that aren’t rooted in evidence. These shifts have created a troubling environment for defendants—one in which not only are some plaintiff-friendly jurors becoming more extreme in their views, but some traditionally defense-friendly jurors are now switching sides and fueling some of the largest recent verdicts.

Join Dr. Nick Polavin, a senior jury consultant with IMS Consulting & Expert Services, and Nicholas Rauch, an attorney at Larson King, as they discuss research on how:

• The two shifts have affected jurors and the way they view evidence, particularly science-based arguments/evidence.
• Defendants can adapt their jury selection strategy and thematic arguments to meet these changes.

Plus earn up to 1.20 hours of CLE credit for attending.

NEW! Exclusive DRI Member Benefit: Free Webinar Registration

DRI is excited to provide members with FREE access to several valuable webinars like this one! Earn up to 8 hours of CLE credit this year at no additional cost to you–that's a savings of $1,350 for being a DRI member!

From conspiracism to succession planning, we are covering a host of hot topics this year to help you expand your knowledge and build your legal practice.